|
|




Research Articles Index |
Underground Nuclear Power Plants 2009 Several Underground Nuclear Power Plants (UNPPs) have been operated since the early 1960s in Europe and the Soviet Union. Russia is studying plans to build more underground NPPs using small "mini" naval reactors.... |
Chernobyl on the Hudson 2009 In September 2004 the Union of Concerned Scientists published a report into the Indian Point nuclear power station, located on the Hudson River 35 miles north of New York.... |
Secret Fallout 2009 "Directly out of the business of nuclear weapons came the business of nuclear power, heralded in our country with the slogan, Atoms for Peace. Even that innocent-sounding slogan is part of the endless pattern of public deception that surrounds..." |
http://www.controlled-demolition.com Controlled Demolition Inc. are well known in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading experts on the subject of controlled demolitions. Many have inferred that their involvement in the clean-up operation after 911 is evidence that they were involved in setting up the building for demolition beforehand. I think this is unlikely. I base this on the revealing interview given by Mr Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI, to New Scientist magazine published on July 24th 2004. This interview should be read by all 911 researchers - salient extracts are in the "Ground Zero" report. CDI's web site presents many photographs of controlled demolitions in progress. The sequence of photographs taken during the demolition of a building in Sao Paulo show very clearly the famous "squibs" firing out of upper floors at the beginning of the operation, similar to those seen at the WTC. There is no doubt that conventional demolition charges were used in the Twin Towers. Why do this if the towers are going to be destroyed by nuclear devices? The pre-positioned conventional charges could not possibly have any controlling effect on the power of the nuclear blast. The reason - Layers of Deep Black Cover. They know that anyone looking at it afterwards with any intelligence will see the towers were blown up with enormous force. But they do not want anyone to suspect it was a nuclear device. So they cover it with evidence of a conventional controlled demolition. This diverts attention away from the fact that they were not simply imploded but volcanically exploded, from the top down. The military use different levels of secrecy and cover stories to mount "Black Ops". One set of operatives are given one reason for what they are doing. Another team, with no mutual knowledge of the other teams, is given a different set of tasks with a different cover story and so on. Everything is compartmentalised on a "need to know" basis so nobody has the complete picture except a few pulling the strings at the top. One team, for example, may have been assigned to electronically hijack the aircraft or direct the "drones" by electronic remote control. They think the new "Gulf of Tonking" attack will be limited to the aircraft crashes. Level One. Another is assigned to plant the charges, under pretence of an anti-terrorist exercise. Another squad know it's for real and oversee it. They don't know it's going to be nuked. Level Two. The "elite" nuclear demolition team set up what they think are "SADMs" - Small Atomic Demolition Munitions - joking about how "Saddam" will be blamed. Level Three. They don't know that clandestine reactors are going to be sent super-critical. Level Four. On the day, each team performs its job in sequence - unaware that even greater perfidy will follow, executed by an even Blacker team. Afterwards, people who realise they have been used can be liquidated. Even the "patriots" who were prepared to go along with a conventional demolition, to "wake the Americans up for their own good", might have balked at contaminating New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout. |
Controlled Demolition Inc. |
Website Themes by CoffeeCup Software |
Killing our Own 2009 "Through the release of atomic energy, our generation has brought into the world the most revolutionary force since the prehistoric discovery of fire. This basic power of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow..." |
Tritium 2008 In 2002, the paper "Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center" was presented at the American Chemical Society National Meeting. This paper is well known in the "911 Truth Movement" for its presentation of anomalous levels of Tritium... |
1700 Designated Ground Zeroes 2008 The National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book "New Evidence on the Origins of Overkill" describes the US military nuclear policy to bring devastating nuclear power to bear against over 1700 targets in China, the Sviet Union.. |
The Last Wave from Port Chicago 2008 The first Atomic Test of the modern age took place at the US Naval Dockyard of Port Chicago, 30 miles north of San Francisco, at 10.30pm on the 17th July 1944... |
Environmental Studies of the WTC Area 2007 This link is to the Forensic Data which proves that the WTC was subjected to intense nuclear explosions. On September 17th and 18th 2001, two scientists from the USGS collected samples of dust from Lower Manhattan... |
Project Gabriel 2007 In the 1950s Project Gabriel was a project to determine how nuclear fallout from US atomic bomb tests is distributed across the world and the biological uptake of fallout products. |
The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 911 Research 2007 This is an article by Morgan Reynolds on Professor Steven Jones and his well known “thermite” theory for the destruction of the Twin Towers. There are some very interesting photographs, of the streets being washed... |
Controlled Demolition Inc. 2007 Controlled Demolition Inc. are by now well known in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading experts on the subject of controlled demolitions. Many have inferred that their involvement in the clean-up operation after 911 is evidence... |